Monday, July 30, 2018

Post turtles

Howdy, dear readers! Have you heard the one about the post turtle?

The story goes that sometimes in the country, you’ll come upon a turtle perched atop a post.
Here's to the Post Turtles on the CC city council!

There are several things you should know about said post turtle:

  • ·         He doesn’t belong up there
  • ·         He didn’t get up there by himself
  • ·         He doesn’t have any idea of what to do while he’s up there
  • ·         He’s elevated beyond his ability to function
  • ·         And you wonder who could have thought it was a good idea in the first place.


Yep, dear readers, we’ve got at least a duo of post turtles who’ve ended up perched on the Copperas Cove city council dais. That’s if you go by the property tax rate workshop this past Thursday.
Curmudgeon has been scrambling to get this written, but it’s summertime and there’s been so much to do in Copperas Cove, ya know?

Anyhoo, Curmudgeon doesn’t know quite where to start with Sorry-Charlie Youngs and Mark-E-Marc Payne.

Let’s get to Sorry-Charlie first. Maybe Mark-E-Marc another time, because he’s something to watch on the dais too.

If you will take a moment to watch the video – when it is finally posted - you’ll see Charlie start grandstanding about cutting from the budget, cutting ALL SENIOR DISCOUNTS. Period. As in, no more new senior discounts for ANYBODY. NOT NO-HOW. (Lucky for him, he’s already getting a discount. But that’s beside the point.)

Where his Post-Turtleness comes into play is the fact he started railing about something that had NOTHING to do with the current discussion.

Will the council talk more about keeping the senior discounts? Tune in for the next installment of the Copperas Cove city council on Tuesday, when the council will hear about proposed fee adjustments.

Let’s get back to the discussion at hand. This discussion was about the GENERAL FUND and property tax rates. Do the water, sewer, and solid waste senior discounts affect the GENERAL FUND where it relates to PROPERTY TAXES?

NO. NO. NO.

They do NOT.

Water, sewer, and solid waste operations are separate FUNDS from the general fund. They are NOT supported by property taxes. So, any senior discounts for THOSE funds had NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DISCUSSION ON THURSDAY.

Clearly this Post Turtle moment for Charlie Youngs showed how clueless this gentleman is about how the funds operate. But, as Sorry-Charlie is wont to remind everyone, HE HAS BEEN ON COUNCIL BEFORE AND KNOWS STUFF.

Umm….

This is the same councilman who admitted at the start of a recent meeting that he violated the Texas Open Meetings act by “replying all” to an email sent to him by a citizen – concerning the Business 190 project.

Oh, and the same councilman who couldn’t/didn’t/wouldn’t file the correct election paperwork with the City Secretary’s office, legal documents that needed to be filed correctly per the Texas Secretary of State’s office. So, Sorry-Charlie gets fine $500 by the Texas Ethics Commission.

If you are a newer reader, you can find out more details about this here:

Umm…  Oopsie! And all we got in those instances was an “Oops, my bad!”

If he can’t handle the small things, how, dear readers, can he handle the big things?

I’m just asking!

Peace, love, and Post Turtles, y’all!

Monday, July 23, 2018

A Curmudgeon Quickie: WTH, FATHOM? And, the tossing of hats

Curmudgeon mentioned FATHOM at the end of the last post.

Well, it's a curious thing that happened during the July 17 Copperas Cove city council workshop. Interim City Manager Haverlah said the dollar amount of the lost revenue from the senior citizen discount listed in the proposed budget for the Water & Sewer Fund was WRONG.

Now, how was it wrong and why?

If you watch the video from the July 17 meeting, Mr. Haverlah explains that the city's director of finances, Velia Key, figured out that the amount being coded or reported as the senior discount, is not the senior discount. It was the payments being received by seniors, or something to that effect. 
I know, Mr. Payne. I know. He sat there like this for a good 30 seconds. 

So she did an audit at the account level and figured out what it was. 

Hmmmm.....so why would FATHOM give the city a wrong number? 

Mr. Haverlah went on to say that the city had made improvements where its utility accounts were concerned and that this coding issue was a small thing. 


Curmudgeon is sorry-not-sorry, but confidence is low in FATHOM due to the floundering, stumbling, bumbling at the individual account levels. Curmudgeon does NOT need to remind you, dear readers, of the issues - legitimate issues- which have come up over the last two years.
Their email didn't work.
Their website was inconsistent with log-in issues.
The transmitters went down and didn't collect correctly (brand new!).
Bills coming out within a week or two of each other.
*They called solid waste rubbish.
*They called the drianage fee a storm water fee.
*They billed at the net for senior discounts without reflecting the discounts.

*These are not ERRORS, per se, but confusion. The change to FATHOM was painful enough - why confuse your customers? It further erodes confidence.

Which is the same with this coding "issue."

No, Mr. Haverlah. It is not a little thing. The CITY is a customer of FATHOM, too, and should not have to deal with glitches I mean, c'mon, this is a multimillion-dollar company which surely should have its act together.

Councilman David I'm-a-writer-not-a-talker Morris did the right thing in calling for an independent audit of the FATHOM books.

The reader should follow this link:

http://www.newsoforange.com/news/article_293babe2-df80-11e7-b01e-532a6cc2f046.html

Apparently not all is well in FATHOM-land, even as the company continues to sell its rather so-so services to cities. Why should one have to bring the CEO into town for basic customer service issues? Clearly there is an issue in mid-level management that is causing this.

Is it time for the city to consider terminating its contract? We're only 2 years into a 15-year deal.
Why 15 years??????
Why not 5-10?????

OH, it's opening day in election season, y'all!!

Let's see what this first week of filing brings.

Coming up - Curmudgeon's Election tips.

Peace, love, and bunnies,  y'all!

Sunday, July 15, 2018

Gloom, despair, and agony on EDC!!!

Dear readers, in case you didn't know, there were two workshops this past week for the Copperas Cove city council. Budget workshops, as in 'let's-hash-all-this-out-before-we-approve-anything.'

There's a few things Curmudgeon would like to address about Thursday night's workshop, but given time restrictions and the fact Curmudgeon has a life (although I'm sure some of you believe otherwise), I'll only pick one today.

What in the world is going on with Marky-E-Marc Payne????

I'm serious, y'all. Pull up the video and watch an approximately 30 minutes of discussion about street maintenance funding. You can see video here:

http://www.copperascovetx.gov/videos_2018/

Start at the 41:00 (41 minutes) mark and watch all the way to 1:04:00 (1 hour, 4 minutes). It builds up the background of why there is more than $500,000 available to the city for street maintenance this year. Yay! This will get some street work done - other than emergency patching - for the first time since the 2014-2015 fiscal year, when street maintenance was taken out of the budget (more about that later).

To put it shortly, Marky-E-Marc is very upset that there is NO budgeting for street maintenance other than the funds approved by voters in November 2016.

But what Curmudgeon believes he is MOST upset about is that the Copperas Cove Economic Development Corporations's 1/2-cent of sales tax funding was cut by COPPERAS COVE VOTERS in 2016 - by 1/8-cent.

Until it was changed by the voters, the EDC got a portion of the city's sales tax dollars, supposedly to fund economic development.

Why the EDC has basically been at a screeching halt for about three years is a matter of debate, depending on who you ask.

No director? Andrea Gardner's fault (Marc's reason, I believe)? An ineffective board that until recently has NOT used its collective voice? The list could go on....

The 1/8-cent of sales tax started being diverted in June 2017 to a special account in the city to be built up to pay for street maintenance.

So, Marc Payne objected to the fact that there's been no funding in the budget since 2014 for street maintenance.

Dapper-Dan Yancey (no tie on Thursday night) tried to explain to Mr. Payne that this is the whole reason the council is having discussions about the budget, prioritizing how to spend money.

My sympathies, Mayor Pro Tem. 
Mr. Payne said until the city starts budgeting for what it needs, or figures out ways to do without something, the city would continue to not budget for things.

Then -- cue the organ music -- he confesses his fear -- 
What would keep "us" from voting another eighth of a cent form the EDC for streets or something else? 

UNTIL WE HAVE NOTHING FOR THE EDC.

Again, poor Dapper Dan, tried to explain to Marc that it is a multi-pronged effort for economic development. 

Marc, scraping the gold coins of the EDC together and tucking them into his jacket, was still worried about the EDC getting de-funded. 

He told Dapper-Dan that he was all for "balance" as long as "they" don’t keep taking it from the EDC.

Who's they, anyway???? 
Voters? 
Rogue council members????

More back 'n forth ensued. Really, there was so much over-talking by Marc whenever anyone tried to speak, it gets a bit jarring. 

He was FREAKING. OUT. 

Ok, y'all?? What's with this money? What's with the EDC?

And, Mr. Payne, you answer to VOTERS, not the EDC!

Marky-Marc was on the EDC board from November 2015 until the city council booted him from the board in September 2017. He ought to know what the EDC funding has been like, but like "kids these days" say, he was butt-hurt that the EDC lost some of its funding. 

In the end of the discussion, Marky-Marc said his philosophy is that "we need to budget for things and that we could easily take another eighth of a cent out and be just as equally proud of what we budgeted." 

His histrionics continued that it "may not stop there" that once "we" (whoever we is, I don't know) opened the door a crack, what's to prevent it from being opened. 

He said "we have to cut somewhere severely."

"We're going to have to cut hard if we’re not going to raise any taxes."

Okie-dokie, dear readers, if you've stuck with me this far, it was important to set it all up. 

First, Copperas Cove voters said a big fat YES, let's divert some of that EDC money to street maintenance fund. Here are how voters voted:


What's the deal with the EDC funds, anyway? Are its coffers so bare, that it couldn't spare ANYTHING? 


(After all, Bradi "I've lived here longer than you buddy" Dewald Diaz claimed that economic development would "cease." Ummmm..... take a look at an older post  while I reel myself in from digressing. Here it is: https://copperascovecurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2018/03/lets-take-trip-down-memory-lane-edc.html.)

Here's the proposed budget lineup. Look at the magical term called fund balance. 




Look at the dates. Again, is the EDC strapped for cash? Nope, don't think so. 


Get over it, Marky-Marc Payne. Let it gooooo, let it gooooo. (Good, now the song will be in your head for the rest of the day, even if you don't have a 3 year old in the house).

But you're partly right. Street maintenance was in the budget, and then went away. So, here we go - 
Why was it out?

Look back to the proposed 2014-2015 budget presentation HERE:



Looking at the cutting/slashing above is VERY IMPORTANT, with an explanation below:




It was a big bonkin' deficit that required MUCH cutting in MANY areas to overcome. 

Why were these deep cuts made? TO NOT RAISE TAXES, y'all. 

Also, to KEEP THE CITY COUNCIL'S POLICY OF THE IDEAL FUND BALANCE. THE GENERAL FUND IS KEY TO OPERATIONS.

Love her, hate her, but Andrea Gardner knew her mission: fulfill the goal set by the council prepare a budget that would NOT RAISE THE TAX RATE. 

And so, street maintenance went buh-bye. Andrea G. did try unsuccessfully for several years to propose a transportation user fee that would have been paid by ALL utility customers on monthly bills. That never went through. So, cutting maintenance was the alternative to overcome that deficit. 

Then in 2016, the council said, yes, let's let the voters decide: Do we take 25% of the EDC funding and divert it to our crumbling streets? And the voters said, "Yasssssss." 

Get over it, Marc. The EDC's only been hurting because of its own lack of action. The board AT ANY TIME -- including when you were on it --- could have TOLD ANDREA GARDNER to put marketing elements and business recruiting elements in the budget, etc. BUT YOU DIDN'T. 

Don't blame lack of funding for lack of progress. The EDC is sitting on a healthy financial base and even the 25% reduction in its funding hasn't hurt it. 

(Thanks to Copperas Cove's sales tax revenue soaring. Why??? Because of Andrea Gardner proposing a loan for $3 million to Endeavor so it could finish the shopping center and give Covites more reasons to shop in Cove. Numbers don't lie, y'all.) 

The most up-to-date EDC numbers are from the EDC's monthly financial report for May 2018:
Beginning fund balance? $5,065,866 (about $2 million reserved for Fort Hood land swap)
Year-to-date sales tax revenues? $825,191 --- and the fiscal year still has four months to go)

Next time, from Thursday's workshop: WTH is going on with FATHOM????!!!!

Friday, July 13, 2018

Let’s give Admin what it wants: or, how to raise $4.1 million in a (bait??)/tax switch


Dear readers, I promised I would revisit CCISD this week, so I am.

That, and the videos are not available of this week's Copperas Cove city council workshops. Which, from what I read and have heard in the buzz, were quite interesting and humorous and entertaining, depending on how you look at it.

If you have paid attention, you will see that there is a “tax ratification election” for CCISD scheduled for September 8.

So what is the deal with this? What are Copperas Cove voters being asked to do?

Superintendent Dr. Joe Burns has called it a “tax switch” so the district will be able to use $4.1 million in its operating fund instead of using it for paying off debt. How can they do this?

Simple!

Get Copperas Cove voters to approve a higher maintenance and operations tax rate.

Here’s the Cliff’s notes version on school property tax:

There are 2 parts of the school property tax. One is for maintenance and operations (M&O), one is for interest an sinking (I&O), or debt payments.

Right now, the district’S TOTAL tax rate is $1.22 per $100 valuation.

$1.04 of that is for M&O. The district pays teachers and does its operations through this fund.
$0.18 of that is for I&S. The district uses this to pay its debt obligation.

What will this “tax switch” do, if it is approved?

Well, voters are being asked to say “Yes” or “No” to the following tax rates:
$1.17 for M&O and $0.18 for I&S.

Okay, take  deep breath. Yes, that adds up to a tax rate of $1.35.

Here’s the “catch” or “covenant” as the legal people call it, with the voters.

CCISD is saying; “Ok, y’all, if you approve this $1.17 for M&O, we promise we will lower the I&S rate to $0.05. And you’ll still pay the same tax rate, except CCISD will get more $$ for teachers, etc.”

In fact, there is a legal resolution that the board approved that they MUST follow through on, if voters approve this.

Here it is:

CCISD has even posted a webpage where you can read more (with a spin of “this is a no-brainer, y’all” approach):

But here’s MY concerns. Which you may, or may not, share.

What’s the proposed CCISD budget for next year?

Why the urgency for this revenue? Of course, the district could always use more money.

But what else is happening besides the reduction of Impact Aid? This is nothing new.

Yet, voters are being asked to approve this without having seen any budget. Yet.

OH, the Admin will present TWO budgets. One budget if voters approve the new tax rates of $1.17 M&O, and one of voters don't and the M&O rate stays the same. Evidently, voters will see the “consequences” of not voting in favor of this measure.

So, if we voters decide to give CCISD admin their way, what happens when it comes time to build a new school? Which, you know is coming up at some point down the road.

What is going to prevent CCISD admin from NOT using its fund balance like last time? When House Creek Elementary was constructed, no loans were taken out. See this following link:


If you read the above link, you will see that CCISD paid *cash* for House Creek Elementary:

“The 95,000-square-foot building was approved in 2009 and the district is paying for the $16.3 million building without taking out a loan for the construction. It used $8.6 million from its Facility Fund balance and $7.8 million from its General Fund balance.”

To give credit where it is due, this is both noteworthy and admirable for a school district to be able to pay cash for brand-new construction of this size.

What is the CCISD fund balance now? Is there enough to fund another school? One would hope so.

You can see the current budget here:

According to the budget, the district STARTED last school year with a fund balance of $64,843,255.

That’s $64 million, squirreled away. Think about that figure, for a moment. Let it sink in.

Estimated ENDING fund balance is: $64,843,225.

The entire budget for the school year was just over $71 million. So, we're talking almost a whole YEAR'S worth of funds saved up!

(And: Why not use fund balance to make up this $4.1 million? It’s a rainy day fund, and it seems to be “sprinkling” if you know what I mean.)

But, can and/or will this use of fund balance for construction happen again with another CCISD facility built from the ground up?

Well, so far, the latest two construction projects haven’t been bond/loan projects.

But, how do we know what the future holds for CCISD facilities?

We know the high school is crowded. If you’ve ever walked the halls during class change time, you’ll know.

We know they are planning a renovation at Fairview/Jewell to open up that campus and expand the cafeteria and start using the Fairview side of the campus.

We know there is a great deal of growth taking place to the north side of Copperas Cove.

Curmudgeon feels there is more to this tale than is being told, at this time. 

 It bears watching to see the proposed budgets and hear the explanations offered for them.